How The Real Math Of Compounding Favors Proven Winners, Not Bargain Bin Stories
In our opinion, financial advisors should stop apologizing for buying stocks at their highs. The math, and William O’Neil’s work, is firmly on the side of paying up for leadership and then selling much higher, instead of forever hunting “cheap” names that rarely lead to anything but client disappointment.
Leadership vs “cheap” is a math problem
Most advisors still live under the old slogan “buy low, sell high.” It sounds prudent, almost conservative, but in practice it often means buying weak, troubled businesses just because the price looks low on a chart or the P/E looks friendly. O’Neil’s research into hundreds of the biggest winners showed something uncomfortable for that mindset: the standout stocks were already near new highs and already in strong uptrends before their major advances.1
When you buy a clear leader that breaks out to a new high on surging volume, you are paying for proven demand and proven execution, not a bargain bin mystery. Cheap stocks are usually cheap for reasons that the market has already weighed and rejected. Their earnings are erratic, their sales growth is dull, and institutions are not accumulating them. Although often called “value” in a pitch deck, the opinion of some is that the math of compounding works better with companies whose profits and prices are already moving up fast.
EXHIBIT 1 - HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE Anatomy of a leadership breakout. A leader, over time and repeatedly, tests resistance, then clears it to a new high on heavier volume — the demand-confirmed move O’Neil’s paper describes, conceptually.
The compounding edge of “buy high, sell much higher”
For an advisor, this is really about expected payoff per unit of risk. O’Neil’s CAN SLIM framework forces you into companies with strong quarterly and annual earnings growth, new products or leadership, tight supply, and visible institutional sponsorship. Those are the stocks that may move 100 percent, 200 percent, or more over a cycle, because the business itself is compounding at high rates.
Contrast that with the usual “it’s down 60 percent, it must be cheap” story. A weak laggard that rebounds 20 percent from a depressed level still leaves the client far behind, and in many cases these names keep drifting lower because nothing fundamental has changed. The leader, bought near a high, might add that same 20 percent in a few weeks as institutions add to positions, then repeat the process again. The math gets simple. A portfolio tilted toward leaders needs fewer correct picks to transform outcomes. A portfolio packed with low-priced laggards needs many miracles just to break even.
EXHIBIT 2 The compounding gap. Illustrative. A leader compounding +20% three times (100, 120, 144, 173) versus a name down 60% that then rebounds +20% (100, 40, 48). These are simple arithmetic examples of compounding — not results from a study of actual stocks — and do not represent any fund’s performance.
Risk management: high price is not high risk
Advisors often worry that clients will see a high share price and equate it with high risk. In O’Neil’s world, risk is defined by behavior, not price level. He recommends cutting losses quickly, usually around 7–8 percent below the buy point, and adding to winners that confirm their strength. That discipline supports the idea that “buy high” is much safer than it sounds, because every position comes with a clear exit tied to the chart and the business, not to hope.
Buying a beaten-down stock because “it can’t go much lower” is actually a reckless move under O’Neil’s leaders buy-sell approach. Weak names tend to keep getting weaker, and advisors who refuse to sell often expose clients to deep, open-ended drawdowns. A leader breaking out to new highs with heavy volume and strong fundamentals, by contrast, has proven demand, improving economics, and an obvious technical line in the sand if the story changes. The sticker price might feel uncomfortable, but the risk is defined and manageable.
EXHIBIT 3 Price shock vs. defined risk. The client’s “high price = high risk” worry, reframed as O’Neil’s behavior-based, sell-rule-defined view of risk. The items paraphrase the paper’s discussion and are not direct quotations.
What this means for your advisory practice
If you manage money for others, the “buy high, sell much higher” mindset asks you to shift your identity, as you seek to become a curator of portfolio holdings consisting of proven business excellence and price strengths — based on the behavior-based research. That means screening for leaders in their industry, with accelerating earnings and sales, relative strength near the top of the market, and clear signs of institutional accumulation.
It also means explaining to clients that you are buying into momentum backed by real numbers, not chasing fads. You can show them that the big historical winners started their runs near highs, not near lows, and that strict sell rules help keep their downside controlled. Over time, your value is no longer in finding “cheap” stocks. It is in steering capital toward genuine leadership and exiting fast when leadership fades. That is how you align your practice with the actual math of compounding, instead of the old slogans that sounded wise but never really earned their keep.
DISCLOSURES
Carefully consider the Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses before investing. This and other information can be found in the Fund’s statutory and summary prospectuses, which may be obtained at CapForceETF.com. Read the prospectus carefully before investing.
Investing involves risks. Principal loss is possible. The Fund's return may not match the return of the Index. Along with general market risks, an ETF that concentrates its investments in the securities of a particular industry, market, sector, or geographic area may be more volatile than a fund that invests in a broader range of industries. Additionally, the Fund may invest in securities that have additional risks. Foreign companies can be more volatile, less liquid, and subject to the risk of currency fluctuations. This risk is greater for emerging markets. Small- and mid-cap companies can have limited liquidity and greater volatility than large-cap companies. Also, ETFs face numerous market trading risks, including the potential lack of an active market for Fund shares, losses from trading in secondary markets, periods of high volatility and disruption in the creation/ redemption process of the Fund.
The IBD® Breakout Stocks Index is the fund’s underlying index and is a proprietary index calculated by Investor’s Business Daily® that seeks to identify stock breakout opportunities, or stocks poised to experience a period of sustained price growth beyond the security's recent "resistance level", with consideration for various market conditions.
The "IBD®" mark and logo have been licensed to the Adviser by Investor’s Business Daily,® ("IBD") for use in connection with the Fund under certain circumstances. The Fund is not sponsored, endorsed or sold by IBD. IBD makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in the Fund. The Investor's Business Daily mark and associated logos are used with permission by IBD.
Neither CapForce ETF, Foreside nor Investor's Business Daily® are related.
CapForce ETFs are distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC.